NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


Eurovision 2007

So we lost Eurovision. We deserved to. Flying the Flag was a terrible song. It was a terrible performance. It was stuck in the 80s, and proved just how pinned to the past the UK is. We got 19 points, which is 13 more than we deserved. And the only reason we deserved just 13 points fewer is that it would leave us a single point ahead of Ireland, whose entry was probably the worst in Eurovision history.

Except for Gemini.

Anyhow, Mark threw his usual Eurovision party and we all gathered around the table of sticky, sickly food we’d assembled because nobody had thought to bring anything sensible, savoury and nourishing. We watched the previews again, drew up the scorecard and settled down to watch.

Two of my favourites had already been knocked out. Switzerland had been tipped to win the whole thing with Vampires are Alive, but it didn’t make it through the semis, and Norway went the same way with a Spanish style toe-tapper that, like the UK, was stuck somewhere in the past, although perhaps by only five years or so.

It was clear from the off that it was going to be a very eastern-dominated contest. Only one country that wasn’t previously a signatory to the Warsaw Pact qualified in the semis, and nothing west of Hungary and Belarus scored more than 100 points on the night itself (the winner, Serbia, bagged 268, which rather puts things into perspective).

Of course, the whingers will say ‘it’s all political’, and ‘it’s all about tactical block voting’, but it’s not. We did the usual round of home voting as we watched it, and our results were very eastern-leaning. Moldova, Georgia, Finland, Serbia, Russian, Ukraine and Slovenia were our top seven. Then came the first western European nation, Germany (Finland WW2 decisions left it so strongly influenced (some might say ‘controlled’) by the Soviet Union during the cold war that it can be safely considered eastern Europe).

So the sad truth of the fact is that the UK put in a rubbish song and earned itself the rubbish result it deserved. The sad scandal of the fact is that despite that shameful result we’ll still qualify for next year’s contest ahead of those far more deserving of a place. The sad predictable outcome is that because we know we don’t need to even try we’ll enter another rubbish song next year. The sad eventuality is that once again the British public will dismiss our next dismal result as ‘predictable’ and ‘political’ and further degrade what is, at the end of the day, just a bit of fun.

Isn’t it time that the UK, Germany, France and Spain (all of whom scored fewer than 50 points apiece this year) lost their automatic right to qualify, regardless of how generously they bankroll the contest?

If you liked that post, then try these...

Innsbruck from above on October 11th, 2005

Belgian Eurovision upset on February 21st, 2003

Barcelona on August 18th, 2004

Up and down and up and down on August 19th, 2004

Innsbruck mountains on October 13th, 2005


One Response to “Eurovision 2007”

  1. James Says:

    I very much agree with you on our song. I think the last few years have proved that Eurovision has moved on but we haven’t.

Leave a Reply