Nik lives in Essex, UK and works in London as the editor of MacUser magazine. The posts and comments on this site do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions of values of his employers.
send an email // view profile
A day full of nice things.
A bright sunny workday, warm enough to walk out for lunch without a coat, which closed with a big noisy thunderstorm when I got back home. Fat drops of water drummed on the window, and on the roof of the car as I drove to the gym for pilates. They wet my shoulders and cooled me as I ran from the car to the door and then sat as my t-shirt dried in the minutes before the class.
Now the world is fresh, and the air is free of the tension that has buzzed around us like static electricity.
It was a good class. I worked hard and now I feel all stretchy and relaxed, and I even managed to contain my giggles when the woman behind me relaxed so much she let out a very noisy fart in the middle of a somersault.
And - finally - I finished The Lord of the Rings on the train this morning. One book a year for three years so I could keep ahead of the films. It has been a long and varied job. At times I have loved it. At times I have hated it. More than once I have wished it was over, but now that it is I’m wondering how long it will be until I start work on it again.
I am also trying to answer the question I asked myself when I set out on this epic reading journey back in 2000 - is Tolkein a good writer or not. I’m not talking about his inventiveness. Unquestionably he is the most inventive mind of many a generation. The breadth and scope of the world of Middle Earth is unlikely to be surpassed in any other work of fiction for a very long time indeed. But in terms of words alone, and readability, how should Tolkein’s abilities be judged.
After The Hobbit I was convinced the answer was ‘no’ - he was not an especially good writer - and I found plenty in the three volumes of Lord of the Rings to confirm my feelings. In places, though, it is a masterpiece that would rival my two all-time writing heroes, Truman Capote and (the latter works of) George Orwell.
And so it is an answer that must be given ‘on balance’. On balance he is indeed an excellent writer. There is not a single word I would have changed in any of those books.
But… and there’s always a but… there are many words I would have removed.
Related posts:
- Rings and things
They've put up big gantries over Oxford Street with spotlights on top of each one. They're supposed to be shining the Olympic rings onto the... - King Arthur
Take the battle scenes from Lord of the Rings, the underlying plot of Gladiator, and mix in a dash of Robin Hood, and what... - Gordon’s flat
I've travelled to London pretty much every day since I started university. That's 13 years. Before that I used to commute to school, so it's...
3 Responses to “End of the Rings”
Xarro, interested to know which books..
“changed the way I look at life”
?
Regards
Kev
• Posted at 10:19 pm on June 18th, 2003 by kev.I really need to read read LotR. So far I’ve only read The Hobbit, which I loved - I love science fiction and adventure books, not for the writing itself but the action and adventure and the sense of the supernatural.
I respect Tolkien for how much he admired the Icelandic sagas and Norse folklore. A lot of that is interwoven into LotR, which is yet another reason why I need to read the triology.
• Posted at 9:07 pm on June 19th, 2003 by Krist.Leave a Reply
It’s Tolkien. Not Tolkein.
But apart from that, you are quite right. Tolkien was a good writer but LotR is not a masterpiece of litterature. It is something else. And something both powerful and efficient.
However I’ve read much better books written in English (and as it’s not my mother tongue, there must be many more). Some even changed the way I look at life. LotR didn’t.
It did something else to me. Somehow it managed to create an alternate world.
• Posted at 12:08 pm on June 18th, 2003 by Xarro.