NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


Ice Bar

Nik and Mark at the Ice Bar
Nik and opposite number Mark from Macworld at the Ice Bar

First week back is always busy. It’s Friday already and only now am I getting to the end of the pile of email that needed to be read and answered. It was also press week.

So, it was nice that there were two excuses to go out, and particularly that Wednesday’s party was somewhere I’d not been before: the Ice Bar. It’s a strange place at the southern end of Regent Street, kept permanently 5 degrees below zero so that the ice from which it’s made doesn’t melt. You can feel the cold in your lungs.

It’s as well they gave us big silvery capes to wear as it was one of the hottest days of the year, so a lot of us had come to work in shorts (and some in sandals, mercifully without socks), which was probably unwise when we all knew where we were going to end up. Needless to say, nobody sat on the ice-sculpted stools, although everyone, at some point, cracked the obvious ‘how embarrassing; we’ve turned up in the same silver outfit’ joke.

What I don’t understand, though, is why we didn’t stick to the glasses. Like everything else in there, they were made from crystal clear ice, drawn from the Torne river, 200km north of the Arctic Circle, yet they didn’t freeze to your lips as they slowly melted in your hand. Perhaps it was the purity of the ice, which was strange stuff to touch. The tables had a slightly gummy finish to them where they’d been rubbed smooth by the thousands of fingers that had swept across them, and weren’t white and frosty like an ice cube.

A bigger mystery, though, is how they get away with having furry-hatted people working in there when the whole point of it is that it’s so cold; well below the regulations for working environments.

Would I pay to go there? I’m not convinced. It would be £12 to get in for 45 minutes, with one drink thrown in for that price and all subsequent drinks £6 a pop, which is a lot - even by London prices. It was fun, though, and perhaps somewhere to take a naive out-of-townie to give them a thrill.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Red-faced reader on October 1st, 2003

Autumn on December 3rd, 2006

Merde on February 10th, 2005

Plush on February 7th, 2002

Election day on June 7th, 2001


Leave a Reply