NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


New job

I happen to know for a fact that there are some jobs going at BT on account of ______ conducting all the interviews on the train last night using her mobile phone.

She was not a credit to her employer.

‘Riiiight. Sorry. I’ve got soooo much on, so I need to do your interview now. You don’t mind, do you? I’m on a train. Now, would you describe yourself as a self-starter? … You would? … Great. OK, and now, do you have a lot of initiative? … Oh, you do. Excellent. … And are you good at working under pressure? … Brilliant. … Yes, well why don’t you come in for a second interview. Shall we say tomorrow at five?’

She did about three of these, each one lasting almost ten minutes, and of course everyone at the other end must just have been saying ‘yes’ to every leading question she asked, because it seems they all got a second interview.

I’m guessing from the next round of calls that a whole load of other people had had similar interviews earlier in the day.

‘Oh, hi there, it’s ______. We spoke earlier about the interview. What time did I say you should come in? I didn’t write it down…’

Pathetic.

And more than a little bit irritating.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Deja-vu on March 13th, 2003

Meet and eat on October 29th, 2003

La langue Francais on August 27th, 2004

It’s over on July 10th, 2002

MPH Show and Shibboleth on November 5th, 2007


Leave a Reply