A Short History of Nearly Everything
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
I’m sitting here trying to write, but really it’s just not going to happen, so I’ve admitted defeat. When I’ve finished typing this I’m going to bed. I think I must have turned soft over Christmas. This first day back at work has wiped me out.
I read the first couple of pages of A Short History of Nearly Everything when I got home, because it’s next month’s Book Club book on Radio 4. I have high hopes on the basis of the first few paragraphs alone:
Consider the fact that for 3.8 billion years, a period of time older than the Earth’s mountains and rivers and oceans, every one of your forebears on both sides has been attractive enough to find a mate, healthy enough to reproduce, and sufficiently blessed by fate and circumstances to live long enough to do so. Not one of your pertinent ancestors was squashed, devoured, drowned, starved, stuck fast, untimely wounded or otherwise deflected from its life’s quest of delivering a tiny charge of genetic material to the right partner at the right moment to perpetuate the only possible sequence of hereditary combinations that could result - eventually, astoundingly, and all too briefly - in you.
That’s a pretty big set of coincidences and accidents, but in those first three pages, it’s already got me wondering about far deeper things: when does life begin, and when does it end?
It is a slightly arresting notion that if you were to pick yourself apart with tweezers, one atom at a time, you would produce a mound of fine atomic dust, none of which had ever been alive, but all of which had once been you.
So if we are all just a bundle of dead atoms that are somehow ‘alive’, how many atoms would you need to unpick to die? Obviously chopping off your head would do it pretty quickly, but what about if you just plucked random atoms from all over (and someone else did it for you when you got to the point where you had no hands left)? Just how many atoms would you need to remove before life disappeared.
Which leads on to another question: what is life?
As I say, all this work stuff had left me feeling rather tired.
If you liked that post, then try these...
My big break on June 5th, 2005
Harry Potter and the Curse of the Supermarkets on July 21st, 2007
Censorship on April 15th, 2006
January books on February 3rd, 2005
Kylie Minogue and White Diamond on October 17th, 2007
January 5th, 2005 at 8:02 pm
Ah yes, one of my favourite books of recent times. I like the passage close to those you’ve quoted that discusses the probability that, if I remember correctly, a million of your atoms were once a part of the likes of Cleopatra. Not Elvis, mind you, as it takes some time for the atoms to be ‘recycled’.
The passage that really endeared the book to me, however, was the one about the scale of the solar system. I confess I forget the specifics, but I recall that it gave me an amazing insight into the sheer scale of cosmology.
That said, I did find the book tailed off a little somewhere around half way through, falling into a still mildly enjoyable Brysonian rambling which was more just a recounting of scientists’ lives and spats with none of the populist scientific panache of the first few chapters. Ho hum.
A woman on Radio 4 this morning reminded me that Cleopatra is closer to us chronologically than she was to the pyramid builders. Fascinating how we tend to clump history together till we lose sight of this kind of chronology.
January 6th, 2005 at 10:11 am
How’s the novel going by the way?