Nik lives in Essex, UK and works in London as the editor of MacUser magazine. The posts and comments on this site do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions of values of his employers.
send an email // view profile
It’s never a good idea to leave films too long before you watch them. Especially not when everyone else has been ranting on about them for a year.
So, Finding Nemo. Very clever. Very well done. Very beautiful in places, but… well, unfulfilling. I think I expected too much, and more than once I got the feeling that certain scenes had been put in there just so the animators could show off how good they were at doing under water 3D stuff.
Perhaps it was just too good. There were whole chunks that looked like they were film, not animation. Maybe we just need to be reminded now and then that this is something very clever.
Which must mean it’s too good to be any good.
About a billion other bloggers have already posted the following image, so no doubt one of them is the clever originator of the piece.

Related posts:
- War of the Worlds
It was an Orange Wednesday yesterday so, for the first time in the decade he's been an Orange customer, Paul took advantage of the two-for-one...
4 Responses to “Finding Nemo”
Moral schmoral. I eat fish and I’m proud of it. (Although I wouldn’t eat goldfish)
• Posted at 10:51 am on March 8th, 2004 by Krist.You wouldn’t eat Nemo would you Kristin? He was so cute. Please spare him.
• Posted at 11:54 am on March 8th, 2004 by Kev.Pass me the sushi.
• Posted at 11:27 pm on March 8th, 2004 by Krist.
Aww that picture, poor fishies. As the film said; fish are for friends not for food. (Did you notice the many moral messages throughout)
• Posted at 11:22 pm on March 7th, 2004 by Kev.