NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


Thunderball

Having finished Casino Royale, I decided to carry on with the Bond books for a while and see how they panned out. Having been such a fan of the films for so long, I thought I really ought to see what inspired them.

I’ve read a few before: Diamonds are Forever and You Only Live Twice years ago while I was working at Thorpe Park, but I remember very little of them. So, I’ve been keen to see how close they were to the film versions.

Which brings us to Thunderball.

The basic plot is the same. Spectre has hijacked an RAF jet, murdered the crew and stolen two atomic bombs. They then proceed to hold the world to ransom, demanding £100,000,000 for the safe return of the weapons. The main baddy is called Largo, and his girlfriend is Domino, just like in the film (or films, I should say, as this book was re-filmed in 1983 as Never Say Never Again - a dreadful Bond immitation, with Kim Basinger as a floppy and unconvincing femme fatale). Blofeld is the head of Spectre - again, as he was in the films.

The back of the book, though, would have been more accurate if it had been reviewing Thunderball the film, rather than Thunderball the work of literature. ‘Hair-raising underwater battles,’ it promises, but in actual fact the battles, such as they are, amount to a small one-on-one skirmish beneath Largo’s boat, and then a brief scene at the very end, from which Bond quickly departs, taking the reader with him. All very disappointing.

What you notice about these books when you read them now, though, as they approach their 45th birthday (Thunderball was written in 1961), is how much more leisurely they are than a modern thriller. There are long, weaving tracts in which little happens, and character descriptions can run to a page or more. Don’t get me wrong: it’s not actually bad. In fact, it’s quite good, as it’s so relaxing, but I can’t believe many publishers would take them seriously if they were submitted for publication now.

Perhaps the strength is in the plot, though. It has aged well, and still seems relevant today:

Bond reached in his pocket for another cigarette. It couldn’t be, yet it was so. Just what his Service and all the other intelligence services in the world had been expecting to happen. The anonymous little man in the raincoat with the heavy suitcase - or golf bag, if you like. The left luggage office, the parked car, the clump of bushes in a park in the centre of a big town. And there was no answer to it. In a few years’ time, if the experts were right, there would be even less answer to it. Every tin-pot little nation would be making atomic bombs in their backyards, so to speak… This was the first blackmail case. Unless Spectre was stopped, the word would get round and soon every criminal scientist with a chemical set and some scrap iron would be doing it. If they couldn’t be stopped in time there would be nothing for it but to pay up.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Christmas TV on May 28th, 2003

Book worm on February 22nd, 2005

The News Quiz on May 4th, 2007

Kylie Minogue and White Diamond on October 17th, 2007

The Day After Tomorrow on June 13th, 2004


Leave a Reply