NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


Weightless debris

‘Could Ejection Seats Have Saved the Columbia Astronauts?’ asks a feature in Slate. The answer, on grounds of height and speed, is a fairly definitive ‘no’. But it is something Nasa has considered in the past. The trouble is any kind of escape mechanism would be prohibitively expensive to retrofit ($1bn for the fleet of 4 (now 3) shuttles, and a timescale of 18 months), and would have to be very, very light to save disrupting the careful balance of weight and thrust.

This whole weight issue is put into context in a piece published in yesterday morning’s Guardian… Before the Texan locals knew a shuttle had disintegrated above their houses, many of them were already being showered by some extraordinary debris:

Fragments were scattered over Louisiana, where one factory owner described watching a “giant ball four feet across float to the earth like a parachute”. “We put our hand above it and then we touched it and there was nothing,” he told the Herald Tribune. “We kicked at it a little bit; the thing doesn’t weigh as much as four gallons of milk. At first I was saying this is probably the coolest thing I have ever seen. Then we found out what it was and it was like, this is not the coolest thing I have seen anymore. It’s too sad.”

If you liked that post, then try these...

Big ladies on August 4th, 2003

Cinema noir on September 8th, 2004

Meet and eat on October 29th, 2003

European Election results on June 14th, 2004

Sweaty Bush on August 14th, 2003


Leave a Reply