Posts Tagged ‘film’

03
Dec
2009
Categories
Journal

Priceless

Fancy a bit of culture?

We spent Saturday night watching Priceless, a French film about a money-grabbing playgirl on the French Riviera. It only counts as ‘culture’ on account of having subtitles, but it’s well worth grabbing a copy now that Amazon is knocking out the DVD for £3.58.

Audrey Tatou (Amelie, The Da Vinci Code) is Irene, the money-mad con-artist, who will bed any man with a fat enough wallet, and it doesn’t give away anything to say that she ends up bedding a pauper. That’s the premise. Or – at least – the way he changes as a result. You can tell that much from the trailer:

It’s beautifully filmed, and the story, with obvious parallels to Breakfast at Tiffany’s, is genuinely funny in a gentle slapsticky way. Cultured slapstick, obviously, on account of the subtitles.

Stars? Four.

15
Feb
2008
Categories
Journal, London, Media

Brief Encounter at the National Theatre

Brief Encounter at the National Theatre

The National Theatre did a special Valentines screening of Brief Encounter last night. It was a chilly outdoor showing, projected onto the wall of the Fly Tower, which looks out over the Thames, to an audience sat about in deck chairs, cocooned in blankets and rugs.

I’d never seen it before (although I thought I had), which was probably for the best. Despite our checked tartan blanket the wind was whipping up around our legs, and I think if I’d known the story and not been so keen to sit it out and see how it ended I might have suggested we left shortly after Celia Johnson’s first cigarette.

But despite the cold, it was utterly captivating, and it left me wondering how I’d managed to get this far through life without having seen it before. Like I had with Casablanca. It’s the story of Laura and Alec. He comes into the tea room at the station where she’s waiting for her train. She gets some grit in her eye and he helps to remove it. One chance meeting leads to another and soon they’re having illicit lunches together and trips out to the country, all the while telling their respective partners half-truths about what they did with the day.

But their relationship was doomed from the start. This was 1945, and such behaviour would have been quite shocking. One lie led to another and another until finally something had to be done to draw it to a close. A few weeks of irresponsible happiness had killed all feeling Laura had for her husband, and she was left, by the end of the film, trapped in an unhappy relationship, which had ultimately been torn to pieces by something so incidental as a piece of grit in her eye.

It drew a capacity crowd. The deckchairs were full before we get there, and so we perched on the side of a flower bed, while other lay right in it, using the neat box hedges as pillows. Some others, better-equipped than ourselves, had brought sleeping bags and garden chairs, and they sat there wrapped up tight, snacking on the tea and bath buns being served up to get us in the mood.

The free guide they gave out included a review from The Monthly Film Bulletin of December 1945, which gave it high praise. ‘There have been few better British films than Brief Encounter even at a time when our studios are taking their place in the vanguard of this great contemporary art‘.

Only half of that statement still holds true. British cinema may no longer be in the vanguard of great contemporary art, but that there have been few better films than Brief Encounter is as true today as it was at the end of the War.

Brief Encounter at the National Theatre

Technorati Tags:
, , , , , , ,

22
Jan
2008
Categories
Media

Goldfinger

We watched Goldfinger at the weekend. Rich had never seen it before, but he made a very good point: Bond doesn’t actually do anything.

M and the Governor of the Bank of England put him on to Goldfinger, so he does nothing there. Felix points him out in Miami, so he doesn’t even have to stalk him. The Bank of England comes up trumps in getting him a game of golf with the man himself, where he manages to plant a bug in Goldfinger’s car.

He follows this over to Switzerland where he gets easily captured (his own stupidity: he crashed into a wall) and flown to Baltimore by Pussy Galore. There he’s held prisoner at Goldfinger’s ranch, until being handcuffed to a nuclear bomb and locked in Fort Knox. A battle rages outside the fort in which, for obvious reasons, Bond can’t take part, and then someone from the CIA bursts in and defuses the bomb. Apart from a little fight on a plane in which a window gets accidentally blown out and Goldfinger is sucked into outer space, that’s it.

So what was Bond’s contribution to the story, considering even his attempts to warn the CIA of Goldfinger’s plot were thwarted?

He seduced Pussy. That’s all. One literal tumble in the hay and a bit of quick kissing (or maybe more, but we’ll never know as this was the 60s and they didn’t show such things back then) and she was turned. She phoned the CIA (where did she get their number?) and double-crossed her employer. End of story.

Yet Goldfinger is held up by many as one of the best Bonds of all time. The third in the series, it was the one in which the team got into its stride. I still like it a lot, but it’s strange that it took a first-time watcher to point out something I’d never noticed before; this isn’t really a James Bond film at all. It’s the story of Pussy Galore.

Technorati Tags:
, , ,

  • Essentials

  • Categories

  • Blog Stats

    • Posts 1,893
    • Words in Posts 657,333
    • Comments 1,428
    • Words in Comments  57,086
    • Tags 222
    • Categories 26
  • Monthly archive

  • Recent Comments