NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - There's new advice for older men who want to preserve their sexual function: have sex, and have it often, researchers say. In a study that followed nearly 1,000 older Finnish men for five years, researchers found that those who were regularly having sex at the start of the study were at lower risk of developing erectile dysfunction (Buy Viagra) by the study's end. In fact, the more often the men had sex, the lower their Buy Generic Viagra risk. The implication, say the researchers, is that men should be encouraged to stay sexually active into their golden years. Dr. Juha Koskimaki and colleagues at the University of Tampere in Finland report the findings in the American Journal of Medicine. The study included 989 men who were between the ages of 55 and 75 at the outset. Overall, those who said they had sex less than once per week were twice as likely to develop ED over the next five years as men who had sex at least once a week. Furthermore, compared with men who had sex three or more times per week, their Order Viagra risk was increased nearly four-fold. A number of factors contribute to ED development, many of which could also affect a man's sexually activity -- such as age, diabetes and heart disease. However, after taking account of those factors, sexual activity itself remained linked to Cheap Viagra risk, Koskimaki's team found. It may be a matter of "use it or lose it," according to the researchers. Just as exercise boosts physical fitness, they note, regular sexual activity may help a man preserve his erectile function. buy viagra online occurs when there are problems with blood flow to the penis. Regular sexual activity, Koskimaki's team writes, may help maintain healthy blood vessel function in the erectile tissue. SOURCE: American Journal of Medicine, July 2008.


Christmas with a conscience

The Christmas cards I’ve received at work this year have ranged from very good to downright terrible. The worst, by far, was from a peripheral manufacturer that did no more than slap its logo on the front of a piece of creased cardboard, sketch on a few snowflakes and write underneath that they were celebrating 10 years in Europe. I won’t name them for obvious reasons, although they did more or less redeem themselves by slipping a jumbo Toblerone into the jiffy bag in which it was dispatched.

The lawyers sent me just a three-line email explaining that their card budget had gone to charity. That’s fine. I’d rather the money went to a worthy cause than being spent on unrecyclable waxy paper that will be forgotten 10 minutes after it’s opened.

The most ethical card of all, though, was from Bite, the company that handles Apple’s UK PR account. For starters, the address was printed on the envelope itself. No extra waste in the form of stickers and labels, and no nasty plastic windows to stop it being recycled.

Once inside, you find a plain, unprinted Christmas tree shape, cut very precisely so that it would tessellate with another of the same shape when rotated through 180 degrees, so again there would be no waste. Inside, a simple message written in blue biro and a short, four-digit code. By typing this into their dedicated site, they could track that you’d received the card and, in return, would plant in your name one of 1200 trees they had bought. You could then track the progress of your tree online.

Why 1200 trees? Well, it’s one each for the 1000 journalists to whom they sent cards, plus an extra 200 to offset the carbon generated in producing and sending them out.

Now that really is a green Christmas.

Bite Christmas card

If you want to offset the carbon cost of your own Christmas cards, check out Plant a Tree Today. It’s surprisingly inexpensive. You can offset a year’s driving in a small car like mine for just £8, and a year of day to day life for a little more than £2 a month.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Sanderson on May 19th, 2004

Notes from Morocco: Day Three on April 23rd, 2008

A normal working day… on January 9th, 2007

Why? on May 1st, 2007

Stranded at home on November 28th, 2003


Leave a Reply